Psychophysics, Gestalts and Games

by   José Lezama, et al.

Many psychophysical studies are dedicated to the evaluation of the human gestalt detection on dot or Gabor patterns, and to model its dependence on the pattern and background parameters. Nevertheless, even for these constrained percepts, psychophysics have not yet reached the challenging prediction stage, where human detection would be quantitatively predicted by a (generic) model. On the other hand, Computer Vision has attempted at defining automatic detection thresholds. This chapter sketches a procedure to confront these two methodologies inspired in gestaltism. Using a computational quantitative version of the non-accidentalness principle, we raise the possibility that the psychophysical and the (older) gestaltist setups, both applicable on dot or Gabor patterns, find a useful complement in a Turing test. In our perceptual Turing test, human performance is compared by the scientist to the detection result given by a computer. This confrontation permits to revive the abandoned method of gestaltic games. We sketch the elaboration of such a game, where the subjects of the experiment are confronted to an alignment detection algorithm, and are invited to draw examples that will fool it. We show that in that way a more precise definition of the alignment gestalt and of its computational formulation seems to emerge. Detection algorithms might also be relevant to more classic psychophysical setups, where they can again play the role of a Turing test. To a visual experiment where subjects were invited to detect alignments in Gabor patterns, we associated a single function measuring the alignment detectability in the form of a number of false alarms (NFA). The first results indicate that the values of the NFA, as a function of all simulation parameters, are highly correlated to the human detection. This fact, that we intend to support by further experiments , might end up confirming that human alignment detection is the result of a single mechanism.


page 17

page 18

page 19

page 21


Human or Machine: Reflections on Turing-Inspired Testing for the Everyday

Turing's 1950 paper introduced the famed "imitation game", a test origin...

Value Alignment, Fair Play, and the Rights of Service Robots

Ethics and safety research in artificial intelligence is increasingly fr...

Graphics Turing Test

We define a Graphics Turing Test to measure graphics performance in a si...

Human or Not? A Gamified Approach to the Turing Test

We present "Human or Not?", an online game inspired by the Turing test, ...

Efficient Evaluation of the Number of False Alarm Criterion

This paper proposes a method for computing efficiently the significance ...

Learning System Parameters from Turing Patterns

The Turing mechanism describes the emergence of spatial patterns due to ...

Decision Aids for Adversarial Planning in Military Operations: Algorithms, Tools, and Turing-test-like Experimental Validation

Use of intelligent decision aids can help alleviate the challenges of pl...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset