Rule reasoning for legal norm validation of FSTP facts

12/05/2014
by   Naouel Karam, et al.
0

Non-obviousness or inventive step is a general requirement for patentability in most patent law systems. An invention should be at an adequate distance beyond its prior art in order to be patented. This short paper provides an overview on a methodology proposed for legal norm validation of FSTP facts using rule reasoning approach.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

research
10/01/2022

Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning

We present argumentation schemes to model reasoning with legal cases. We...
research
03/10/2016

The Algorithm of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) with Validation of an Entscheidungsproblem

The historic background of algorithmic processing with regard to etymolo...
research
06/20/2023

Hallucination is the last thing you need

The legal profession necessitates a multidimensional approach that invol...
research
10/13/2018

Overview of CAIL2018: Legal Judgment Prediction Competition

In this paper, we give an overview of the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP...
research
01/12/2022

DPCL: a Language Template for Normative Specifications

Several solutions for specifying normative artefacts (norms, contracts, ...
research
08/27/2019

Datalog Reasoning over Compressed RDF Knowledge Bases

Materialisation is often used in RDF systems to derive, in a preprocessi...
research
09/14/2020

Knowledge-Based Legal Document Assembly

This paper proposes a knowledge-based legal document assembly method tha...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset