Strategic Argumentation is NP-Complete

12/16/2013
by   Guido Governatori, et al.
0

In this paper we study the complexity of strategic argumentation for dialogue games. A dialogue game is a 2-player game where the parties play arguments. We show how to model dialogue games in a skeptical, non-monotonic formalism, and we show that the problem of deciding what move (set of rules) to play at each turn is an NP-complete problem.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/14/2018

Losing at Checkers is Hard

We prove computational intractability of variants of checkers: (1) decid...
research
08/30/2020

Corruption and Audit in Strategic Argumentation

Strategic argumentation provides a simple model of disputation and negot...
research
06/29/2019

Ludii and XCSP: Playing and Solving Logic Puzzles

Many of the famous single-player games, commonly called puzzles, can be ...
research
07/09/2020

Dota Underlords game is NP-complete

In this paper, we demonstrate how the problem of the optimal team choice...
research
12/14/2020

Games and Computational Complexity

Computers are known to solve a wide spectrum of problems, however not al...
research
04/28/2014

Credulous and Skeptical Argument Games for Complete Semantics in Conflict Resolution based Argumentation

Argumentation is one of the most popular approaches of defining a non-mo...
research
10/13/2022

Dungeons and Dragons as a Dialog Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

AI researchers have posited Dungeons and Dragons (D D) as a challenge ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset