Synthesizing cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-regression

by   Tasnim Hamza, et al.

In network meta-analysis (NMA), we synthesize all relevant evidence about health outcomes with competing treatments. The evidence may come from randomized controlled trials (RCT) or non-randomized studies (NRS) as individual participant data (IPD) or as aggregate data (AD). We present a suite of Bayesian NMA and network meta-regression (NMR) models allowing for cross-design and cross-format synthesis. The models integrate a three-level hierarchical model for synthesizing IPD and AD into four approaches. The four approaches account for differences in the design and risk of bias in the RCT and NRS evidence. These four approaches variously ignoring differences in risk of bias, using NRS to construct penalized treatment effect priors and bias-adjustment models that control the contribution of information from high risk of bias studies in two different ways. We illustrate the methods in a network of three pharmacological interventions and placebo for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The estimated relative treatment effects do not change much when we accounted for differences in design and risk of bias. Conducting network meta-regression showed that intervention efficacy decreases with increasing participant age. We re-analysed a network of 431 RCT comparing 21 antidepressants, and we did not observe material changes in intervention efficacy when adjusting for studies high risk of bias. In summary, the described suite of NMA/NMR models enables inclusion of all relevant evidence while incorporating information on the within-study bias in both observational and experimental data and enabling estimation of individualized treatment effects through the inclusion of participant characteristics.


Combining randomized and non-randomized data to predict heterogeneous effects of competing treatments

Some patients benefit from a treatment while others may do so less or do...

A Bias Correction Method in Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials with no Adjustments for Zero-inflated Outcomes

Many clinical endpoint measures, such as the number of standard drinks c...

Methods for the inclusion of real world evidence in network meta-analysis

Background: Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) is a key component of submission...

Efficient Integration of Aggregate Data and Individual Patient Data in One-Way Mixed Models

Often both Aggregate Data (AD) studies and Individual Patient Data (IPD)...

Evidence synthesis with reconstructed survival data

We present a general approach to synthesizing evidence of time-to-event ...

A robust Bayesian bias-adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis

Meta-analysis is a statistical method used in evidence synthesis for com...

Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis

Network meta-analysis has been gaining prominence as an evidence synthes...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset