A tight negative example for MMS fair allocations

04/11/2021
∙
by   Uriel Feige, et al.
∙
0
∙

We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods to agents with additive valuation functions. Kurokawa, Procaccia and Wang [JACM, 2018] present instances for which every allocation gives some agent less than her maximin share. We present such examples with larger gaps. For three agents and nine items, we design an instance in which at least one agent does not get more than a 39/40 fraction of her maximin share. Moreover, we show that there is no negative example in which the difference between the number of items and the number of agents is smaller than six, and that the gap (of 1/40) of our example is worst possible among all instances with nine items. For n ≥ 4 agents, we show examples in which at least one agent does not get more than a 1 - 1/n^4 fraction of her maximin share. In the instances designed by Kurokawa, Procaccia and Wang, the gap is exponentially small in n.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Continue with:
Or login with email
Enter Password
Re-enter Password

Forgot password? Click here to reset
Success!
Error Icon An error occurred

Sign in with Google

×

Use your Google Account to sign in to DeepAI

×
Pro

Consider DeepAI Pro

Subscribe to DeepAI Pro
DeepAI Pro
Provides a limited generation allowance each month. When exceeded, you are charged overage rates available at deepai.org/pricing. Also includes an ad-free experience and API access. Renews automatically until canceled. Non-refundable.
Subtotal
Total due today

Payment

Add DeepAI credits
DeepAI credits
One-time purchase. Credits are added to your wallet after payment.
Subtotal
Total due today

Payment