A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Robustness of (Real-World) Election Winners

08/29/2022
by   Niclas Boehmer, et al.
0

Contributing to the toolbox for interpreting election results, we evaluate the robustness of election winners to random noise. We compare the robustness of different voting rules and evaluate the robustness of real-world election winners from the Formula 1 World Championship and some variant of political elections. We find many instances of elections that have very non-robust winners and numerous delicate robustness patterns that cannot be identified using classical and simpler approaches.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/22/2022

Real-world-robustness of tree-based classifiers

The concept of trustworthy AI has gained widespread attention lately. On...
research
05/14/2023

Robustness of Participatory Budgeting Outcomes: Complexity and Experiments

We study the robustness of approval-based participatory budgeting (PB) r...
research
02/05/2020

Evaluating approval-based multiwinner voting in terms of robustness to noise

Approval-based multiwinner voting rules have recently received much atte...
research
04/07/2022

Collecting, Classifying, Analyzing, and Using Real-World Elections

We present a collection of 7582 real-world elections divided into 25 dat...
research
04/01/2019

Robustness of 3D Deep Learning in an Adversarial Setting

Understanding the spatial arrangement and nature of real-world objects i...
research
08/01/2022

Robustness of Greedy Approval Rules

We study the robustness of GreedyCC, GreedyPAV, and Phargmen's sequentia...
research
12/08/2020

Robustness of Model Predictions under Extension

Often, mathematical models of the real world are simplified representati...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset