An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs

05/07/2021
by   Gauthier Chassang, et al.
0

This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence, namely psychology and engineering, and from disciplines aiming to regulate AI innovations, namely AI ethics and law. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems. Relevant concepts are integrated into a matrix intended to help defining more precisely when and how computing tools (programs or devices) may be qualified as AI while highlighting critical features to serve a specific technical, ethical and legal assessment of challenges in AI development. Some adaptations of existing notions of AI characteristics are proposed. The matrix is a risk-based conceptual model designed to allow an empirical, flexible and scalable qualification of AI technologies in the perspective of benefit-risk assessment practices, technological monitoring and regulatory compliance: it offers a structured reflection tool for stakeholders in AI development that are engaged in responsible research and innovation.Pre-print version (achieved on May 2020)

READ FULL TEXT

page 7

page 22

page 23

research
05/16/2023

QB4AIRA: A Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), exemplified by Ch...
research
02/06/2022

Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal

Following on from the publication of its Feasibility Study in December 2...
research
07/28/2017

Toward the Starting Line: A Systems Engineering Approach to Strong AI

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or Strong AI aims to create machin...
research
03/02/2022

Artificial Concepts of Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Compliance and Resistance in AI Startups

Scholars and industry practitioners have debated how to best develop int...
research
05/09/2023

Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools, and Technical Documentation in ML

The growing need for accountability of the people behind AI systems can ...
research
11/18/2019

The AI Liability Puzzle and A Fund-Based Work-Around

Certainty around the regulatory environment is crucial to enable respons...
research
10/31/2022

Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset