Self-consistency of voting implies majority vote

06/30/2018
by   Artur Poplawski, et al.
0

Paper develops axiomatic characterization of the family of majority vote rules in the way alternative to characterization of the majority vote given in paper of Kenneth O. May in the 1952. This, similar but different, axiomatics focuses on the consistency of the voting procedure. Both approaches are compared. Relation to famous Kenneth J. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is also discussed.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/16/2018

Measuring Majority Power and Veto Power of Voting Rules

We study voting rules with respect to how they allow or limit a majority...
research
02/21/2023

Why Majority Judgement is not yet the solution for political elections, but can help finding it

Like many other voting systems, Majority Judgement suffers from the weak...
research
04/16/2012

When majority voting fails: Comparing quality assurance methods for noisy human computation environment

Quality assurance remains a key topic in human computation research. Pri...
research
12/02/2013

Consistency of weighted majority votes

We revisit the classical decision-theoretic problem of weighted expert v...
research
10/05/2021

Tradeoffs in Hierarchical Voting Systems

Condorcet's jury theorem states that the correct outcome is reached in d...
research
08/10/2021

Level-strategyproof Belief Aggregation Mechanisms

In the problem of aggregating experts' probabilistic predictions over an...
research
05/26/2020

Mathematics of Nested Districts: The Case of Alaska

In eight states, a "nesting rule" requires that each state Senate distri...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset